More from
Bloomberg
Opinion
Economics

Tariff Man’s Trade War Will Claim Innocent Victims

Trump thinks China pays when he slaps penalties on imports. It’s actually American consumers who bear the burden. 

Tariff Man’s Trade War Will Claim Innocent Victims

Trump thinks China pays when he slaps penalties on imports. It’s actually American consumers who bear the burden. 

This is working out just fine.

Photographer: Kyodo News/Getty Images
Photographer: Kyodo News/Getty Images

In a series of tweets earlier today, President Donald Trump announced that he was a “Tariff Man,” trumpeting the revenue raised by tariffs and declaring that import taxes would maximize the U.S.’s economic power:

As Paul Krugman pointed out, it’s a fallacy to think that foreigners are the only ones paying the tariff bill. U.S. consumers pay as well. Believing that tariffs are a tax on foreign countries is like believing that sales taxes are a tax on Wal-Mart.

It’s also makes little sense for Trump to brag about the tax revenue his tariffs are creating, when his own tax cuts have increased the deficit by enormous amounts. So far the tariffs have raised a few billion in revenue, while the tax cuts are expected to cost about $100 billion every year.

Beyond these basic inconsistencies and mistakes, though, Trump’s faith in tariffs as a tool of economic greatness is misplaced. As a mechanism for increasing a country’s strength in global markets, they leave much to be desired.

First of all, the burden of tariffs falls mostly on domestic consumers -- in other words, Americans -- because the prices of many traded goods are set in world markets. Suppose a Chinese company is selling a washing machine in the U.S. for $1,000. Trump then sets a tariff of $200 on the washing machine. The Chinese company knows that it can go sell its washing machine somewhere else without the tariff -- France, or Japan, or Russia -- and still get about $1,000 for it. So in order to make it worth the Chinese company’s while to sell the machine in the U.S., it’s going to have to raise the sticker price to $1,200.

That’s an idealized example, of course -- in fact, the U.S. domestic market is large enough where it has some power to affect global prices, so Chinese merchants will pay some small portion of the tariff. But much of the cost of the tax will be borne by the American consumer.

The second reason tariffs aren’t great is that they don’t take currency movements into account. When the U.S. taxes another country’s goods, it puts downward pressure on that country’s currency. When China’s yuan falls against the U.S. dollar, it makes Chinese goods cheaper, canceling out some of the effect of the tariff. The yuan was at about 16 cents to the dollar earlier this year, but as Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese goods and ramped up his trade-war rhetoric, it fell to roughly 14 cents -- a decline of more than 12 percent:

Tariffs Will Do That to a Currency

Yuan to dollar exchange rate

Source: Bloomberg

That currency drop made all Chinese goods -- not just the ones Trump put tariffs on, but all of them -- cheaper in the U.S. That is probably one big reason why Trump’s tariff announcements didn’t do anything to cut the U.S. trade deficit with China, which has hit record highs this year:

Still Hitting Records

Chinese exports to U.S. and trade balance both hit record

Source: China Customs General Administration

The third reason tariffs are bad is that if done wrong, they can make life harder for U.S. manufacturers and exporters. As Krugman and others (including myself) have repeatedly pointed out, many of the Chinese goods that Trump is taxing are parts, machinery and materials that U.S. manufacturers need to make their products:

Manufacturing Would Be Hit Hardest

Trump's threatened tariffs against China, by product type

Source: Chad Brown, Peterson Institute for International Economics

By raising production costs, tariffs make U.S. manufacturers less competitive, both at home and abroad -- exactly the opposite of what Trump wants to do. A recent report by UBS Group AG found that American companies are starting to shift production overseas in response to Trump’s tariffs.

Raising the competitiveness of U.S. companies is a worthy goal, but tariffs are a bad tool for the job. There is a better one available -- export subsidies. Instead of taxing foreign products in the U.S. market, use tax revenue -- from income taxes, which don’t distort the economy very much -- to help U.S.-based companies sell their wares abroad. Export subsidies aren’t perfect; they also hurt the U.S. consumer, because they allow companies to raise domestic prices to match the higher prices they can get overseas. But by nudging U.S. companies to get out of the cozy domestic market and compete on the world stage, they probably give productivity a boost.

Trump’s goal of making the U.S. more competitive isn’t bad, but he needs to stop using bad tools. Tariffs will not, as he said, “max out our economic power”; instead, to the extent that they aren’t canceled out by currency movements, they will raise costs for American manufacturers and prices for American consumers. Tariff Man needs to cool his jets.

    This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

    To contact the author of this story:
    Noah Smith at nsmith150@bloomberg.net

    To contact the editor responsible for this story:
    James Greiff at jgreiff@bloomberg.net

    Comments 0